The table below illustrates results of Power 5 conference series against the spread in the most recent 10 games of the given series. In some cases, fewer than 10 games in the series have been played so the full series record against the spread is shown. If a game was played in a year when one or both of the teams were not in their current conference I have still included them. All data was pulled from https://www.oddsshark.com/ncaaf/database which appears to contain results going back to the 1995 season.
The most interesting data points to me are the outliers, where one team has won at least 8 of the last 10 games against the spread. My question is why does Vegas err on one side of the line in these series so consistently? Is this just coincidence and bound to happen when setting lines for such a large number of games, or is there something particular that happens for these teams that leads the results to skew one way? Of the 21 outliers identified, 14 of them have scheduled games in 2018. I will be tracking the results of those games this year to see if the outliers are more likely to remain skewed in that direction, revert to the mean, or if there is no obvious correlation at all and this is dictated by randomness.
There has been a lot of discussion about the OTL report since my last post that needs to be addressed. Most notably the intensity of the responses to this report, particularly from Michigan State supporters and media members who cover Michigan State athletics. I want to break down these responses into a few categories and provide some additional information to help clarify some points of contention.
Why were players named who were accused of sexual assault but not charged?
This seems to be the most commonly posed question of the original ESPN report as well as their follow-up report this week in which a current MSU basketball player was named as being accused of sexual assault but not charged. Without context it may sound unfair to name this player as that has not been the practice of local media covering MSU when accusations occur; their local media has waited until charges have been filed to name the player. However, withholding names of college athletes accused but not charged with sexual assault is not a common practice nationally. Here are some examples where athletes had not been charged with sexual assault yet were still named:
Boise State– Names and pictures of the accused appear in the article, yet no charges had been made.
No criminal charges have been brought against the players.
Perhaps the confusion comes from the common practice of not naming victims of sexual assault accusations? Claiming it is uncommon to name the accused, however, is simply not true.
Why did Izzo and Dantonio’s picture appear in a graphic with Larry Nassar about this report?
A graphic appeared on screen in the studio background of the Outside the Lines when their report aired which depicted Izzo and Dantonio in the foreground and Nassar in the background. This apparently was controversial because it could have been interpreted as all three of these men committed the same crimes? I’m not sure of specifically why this sparked so much outrage, but it is worth addressing. ESPN used this graphic to advertise their report, a report which included all three of these names. To me, its intent appeared to be to entice anyone who saw the graphic to want to read the article. I can’t imagine how anyone would see the graphic and think that all three of these men were convicted of the same crime, and if someone did have that initial reaction, wouldn’t they be likely to read the article to verify that rather than just assume their initial reaction was correct? Perhaps that is assuming too much from the average ESPN viewer, but I really don’t think it is. If a reader is able to clarify why this graphic was controversial, please explain in the comments.
This article was purely to attack Izzo and Dantonio, right?
The report aimed more at a culture at Michigan State which bred ignorance to reports of sexual assault. Were Izzo and Dantonio included as pieces of that culture? Yes. Were they the only pieces? No, far from it. A great explanation of this report’s intentions:
The story is MSU trying to hide everything. That’s the headline. Trying to hide things is how Nassar was allowed to happen. You can compare that aspect without comparing the crimes.
Not enough questions were asked about Nassar when they needed to be. (2/?)
ESPN is not credible, therefore they should be attacked for their reporting
This is such an odd strategy to deploy. There were a ton of accusations of sexual assault committed by Michigan State athletes that this report shared. In each case, there were no charges. However:
I've had this conversation a number of times recently, so to get my thoughts out there:
If you require a criminal charge as a prerequisite for disciplining players for sexual impropriety, you're sending players a clear message that anything short of that is permissible.
This is the problem. Michigan State needs to explain how they have handled accusations and provide evidence that they have done so properly. The burden is not on ESPN to prove anything; they shared as much information as they were able to obtain, despite repeated attempts by Michigan State to deny them information.
In September 2014, ESPN submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to MSU for incident reports involving 301 student-athletes. The university responded to the request with two sets of records but redacted the names of student-athletes listed as suspects, witnesses or victims, according to the Court of Appeals’ opinion
It’s not just Michigan State supporters who are attacking ESPN either. From the most recent report:
Outside the Lines reached out Thursday afternoon to multiple university officials and Washington for comment. None responded to calls, voicemails or emails. Outside the Lines also reached out to John Truscott, who was hired recently to lead the university’s crisis communications efforts. Truscott, in response to a series of questions about the alleged incident and a request to release the police report, wrote in an email that he was not in a position to know anything about the case; when asked whether he would provide someone at the university who could answer questions or provide a statement, he responded that “I’m just saying we don’t have any information at this time but will certainly look into it. We don’t have access to police reports, nor does the police department inform anyone of actions such as this.”
Yet here is how Truscott responds on Twitter to this very same report:
Ethical journalists don’t publish names of the accused- they wait until there’s enough evidence for a charge. Otherwise they risk defaming innocent people
Interesting that the leader of MSU’s crisis communication efforts is “not in a position to know anything about the case,” and claims that “we don’t have any information at this time” yet has the gall to then attack the reporter’s ethics on Twitter. Also, refer back to the beginning of this post to debunk the “you can’t name the accused with no charges” stance.
Additional Information
ESPN has shared a lot of information so far, and likely will continue to do so going forward until Michigan State starts talking. Below are a few items I’ve found or been pointed to while doing some of my own research on this story (something I suggest that everyone who has been following this story should do. Rather than spending time attacking ESPN, use that time and energy to find the truth).
The beginning of the police’s interview with Adreian Payne. Note that this is definitely not the entire interview, as some clips that OTL aired are not included in this segment, and that this segment abruptly cuts off at the end of Payne’s initial recount of events and just as clarifying questions are beginning to be asked.
Ashley Dowser’s passing is shared on an MSU message board, as she was a known visitor of the board:
Izzo mentions Travis Walton by name in reference to his hometown’s proximity to that of a Michigan player’s. Note that this game was played on January 13th, nearly 2 weeks before the OTL report was released. Quote begins at the 2:30 mark and reference to Walton at around 2:50 mark.
The East Lansing District Court Register of Actions database, where you can search by name for police reports. Type in Walton,Travis (no spaces) to find all referenced police reports in the OTL report. The assault and battery report is case number 10-0792. The littering charge that it was plead down to is case number 10-0792X. Walton was living in Izzo’s basement by January 28 at the latest and the A&B was reported on January 16. Note that his listed address changes from a home address in the A&B and littering reports to an apartment in case number 1058401 which was entered on June 23, 2010. This implies that Walton had definitely moved out of Izzo’s basement by June, but it is still unknown exactly when he had moved in and out.
A former MSU athletic director (who hired Tom Izzo in the 90’s) talks about the culture at MSU. From the article:
“The buck stops at the top in almost every enterprise,” said Baker, 75, who now lives in Boynton Beach, Florida. “It goes back to the language throughout Title IX — that people in charge either knew, or should have known.
“I think the arrogance of the culture set in.”
Also from this article:
Felice Duffy, a New Haven, Connecticut, attorney who has practiced Title IX law for 40 years, said the university’s vulnerability could be tied primarily to appearances the school did not adequately report students’ complaints.
“Any employee the student believes might have responsibility to report — even a residence assistant or a janitor — which would include a medical staff, they are required to report to the Title IX coordinator if they have any reason to know of potential sexual conduct,” said Duffy, who also is a former women’s volleyball coach at Yale. “If they don’t do that, that is a problem.
“It also sounds as if there was significant information from the investigation that wasn’t provided to some survivors — and that’s a real problem. That shows cover-up. That shows a lot of things.”
Unrelated, but a crazy story about a former MSU player discussing improper benefits in a taped phone call:
This same player supposedly plotted to kill then football coach and current Board of Trustee member George Perles:
Wagner, a former Michigan State University offensive lineman who reportedly admitted to a plot to kill Spartan Coach George Perles, has answers for everybody who’s asking.
This incredible foreshadowing of Hollis’ chances at replacing Jim Delany as Big Ten commissioner someday:
Most view two current league athletic directors—Northwestern’s Jim Phillips and Michigan State’s Mark Hollis—as potential heirs apparent. But a half-dozen years or so certainly is a long time frame for candidates to survive.
A 1998 story I wrote for The State News about how MSU tried to convince East Lansing not to make public a police report on an alleged assault committed by baskeball star Mateen Cleaves. pic.twitter.com/ydz5uQco6o
If you have any additional information to share which might help clarify the situation, please include it in the comments below.
*UPDATE: In response to nick h’s comment below, screenshot of a reply on Twitter from the author of the post linked in nick h’s comment where he walks back his original stance on the OTL article. This was after he changed his Twitter handle from @gHostRCMB to @smcAZ77, but before he deleted his Twitter altogether (included here because I’m not paying for an upgrade to WordPress to allow photos in comment sections):
Disclaimer: The goal of this article is not to provide answers, but rather to ask more questions about what happened, who was involved, and how to move forward. This article will be periodically updated as new information is discovered. Additionally, the following assumptions will be made:
All identified victims’ stories are to be believed. The entire reason we are suddenly talking about so many events this week that occurred over a long period of time is because these stories were not initially believed. The first step towards finding a solution is acknowledging that a problem exists. If the reader feels this assumption is unfair, stop reading now.
The situation is fluid and non-binary. New information is arriving every day which may change the direction of this story completely. Nothing is 100% true or 100% false; memories fade, people stumble over their words, and mistakes occur. None of these scenarios void anything; we are living exclusively in the gray area. If the reader feels this assumption is unfair, stop reading now.
Sources with an unknown or non-existent track record are dismissed as not credible. When collecting information, always consider the source. Have they been reliable in the past? Have you heard of them before they provided the current information? If the answer to either of these questions is ‘no’ then they are not yet a credible source and their information will be dismissed. If the reader feels this assumption is unfair, stop reading now.
What Happened
On Friday January 26th, ESPN’s Outside the Lines released their findings on a 3-year-long investigative report which suggests that Michigan State University has a long history of withholding information related to sexual assaults on their campus. Additionally, Outside the Lines aired video segments of this report on Sportscenter on Friday the 26th and E:60 on Sunday the 28th, both on ESPN. These came on the heels of Larry Nassar’s sentencing, which suggests that these two stories are closely related. In many ways they are related: The nature and location of the offenses are quite similar, however the people involved do not overlap as much as it might first appear. MSU’s now former president Lou Anna Simon resigned on Wednesday, the same day as Nassar was sentenced. This was a direct result of her failure to oversee and stop his actions as early as should have been reasonably expected of someone in her position of power. Mark Hollis resigned on Friday, a few hours before the OTL report was made public. This initially suggested that he was resigning due to Nassar’s mishandling, since it was not yet publicly known what was in the OTL report. However, Hollis previously claimed that he had no knowledge of what Nassar had been doing, and even went as far as to say he was unsure if he had ever met Nassar. It seemed a little odd that he would have distanced himself so much from Nassar initially only to later resign as a result of those actions, but it was generally accepted that that was the case. Further, OTL referenced attempted communication with Hollis two days before his resignation in their report:
Hollis resigned Friday, two days after Outside the Lines asked MSU spokesman Jason Cody and the university’s sports information department for interviews with multiple MSU administrators and athletic officials, including Hollis, Izzo and Dantonio. Outside the Lines told Cody of the main findings of its reporting for this story.
It can be reasonably inferred that Jason Cody relayed this information to Hollis prior to Friday, and therefore Hollis had knowledge when he resigned that the public did not yet have. This does not ensure he resigned because of the OTL report, but it certainly casts some doubt over whether he resigned purely because of Nassar. Only Hollis can provide a definitive answer to this, and as of this writing he has not provided that information publicly.
Who Was Involved
The report makes reference to the following individuals who were previously or are currently affiliated with Michigan State by name:
Mark Hollis, former athletic director
Mark Dantonio, current head football coach
Tom Izzo, current head basketball coach
Travis Walton, former basketball player and staff member
Adreian Payne, former basketball player
Keith Appling, former basketball player
Keith Mumphery, former football player
Several other former players are referenced, though not by name. From the report:
Since Dantonio’s tenure began in 2007, at least 16 MSU football players have been accused of sexual assault or violence against women, according to interviews and public records obtained by Outside the Lines.
Walton’s name would come up in another allegation involving a female MSU student. He and two basketball players — who played for him in the NCAA tournament — were named in a sexual assault report made by the woman and her parents to the athletic department, according to a university document obtained by Outside the Lines.
It is assumed that Mumphery is included in the “at least 16 MSU football players” count, and that Payne and Appling are not the same “two basketball players” which went unnamed. This brings the total to 5 basketball players (Walton, Appling, Payne, 2 unnamed) and at least 16 football players (Mumphery and at least 15 unnamed).
Neither Dantonio or Izzo committed any of the alleged assaults; their names are included because players on their teams were alleged to commit these assaults and it is unclear whether their players’ actions faced appropriate consequences.
Why it Matters
Aside from the obvious answer that it is important to seek justice for victims of these assaults, this particular report has become a lightning rod of conversation because of the coach’s names referenced in the report. The report implies that the coaches should have known what was happening with their players and did not take appropriate action to discipline their players and/or notify the appropriate authorities in all instances. The presumed fallout of admission of guilt would at the very least include a resignation of their roles as coaches, which is the biggest point of contention in all of this. The biggest question remaining is: Should the coaches be held as accountable for overseeing these incidents as former president Simon and former athletic director Hollis? In other words, should the coaches resign?
How should this be handled?
It depends who you ask. There is no consensus, only anecdotal observation of opinions. Based on my observations, there are 3 different opinions, and it is impossible to quantify which groups have the most and least support so I will not attempt a guess. The opinions are:
Group1: Both coaches should not be implicated (retain their positions)
Group2: Both coaches should be implicated (resign their positions)
Group3: We do not yet have enough information to make a valid decision
Dantonio and Izzo have each publicly stated that they have no intentions of resigning/retiring at this time, which puts each of them in Group1. The OTL investigative reporter’s and the interviewed former sexual assault counselor Lauren Allswede’s opinions appear to place them in Group2. The general public is disbursed throughout all 3 groups in an unknown distribution.
Since the assumption that the situation is fluid and non-binary has been made, I will go straight to the third opinion and seek to provide as much information as I can find. Please consider who the source is of each item before drawing any conclusions on the information provided. I have used my best judgment to not include any sources deemed to be not credible, but my judgment, like everyone’s, is not without flaws & biases.
The most important piece of information discovered so far is that Travis Walton lived in Tom Izzo’s basement the year after his eligibility as a player expired, while he was on Izzo’s staff. This from an article written last week:
Note that this article was posted on January 23, 2018; 3 days before the OTL report was released. The byline of this article is as follows:
Bob Seggerson is a retired boys basketball coach and guidance counselor at Lima Central Catholic. Reach him at bseggerson@lcchs.edu
Excerpt:
Walton took a shot at playing at the next level, joining the Detroit Piston’s summer league team, but was not offered a contract. Faced with a decision about what to do next, it was Coach Izzo who stepped in and made Travis an offer he couldn’t refuse. “I was nine hours short of graduation,” Walton says. “Coach Izzo encouraged me to return to MSU, work with him as a student assistant coach, and earn my degree.”
Walton moved into Izzo’s basement and spent the year completing his degree, learning the art of coaching and staying in shape by working out with the team. It was an easy transition for Travis. “I was always a big film guy, so spending hours watching tape came easy for me,” Walton says. “I began to see the game through a coach’s eyes,” he added. “The same mistakes I made that drove coach Izzo nuts when I was playing for him, were driving me nuts now.”
After earning his degree, Walton spent three years chasing his dream of playing professional basketball, joining clubs in Switzerland and Germany and playing for three different teams in the NBA D league. But when coach Izzo connected him with an opportunity to join the coaching staff for the Utah Stampede in the NBA’s D league, Walton jumped at the opportunity.
Two articles from 2010 referencing Walton’s living arrangements at the time (the 2nd link is inactive so I had to pull it from an archived site):
Brenda Tracy (@brendatracy24) is a rape survivor and has told her story on college campuses across the country. She spoke to Tom Izzo last summer. Would she take her message to East Lansing today? pic.twitter.com/bT3ZaaTIyS
For context of Izzo’s response below, excerpt from the OTL report:
The letter Allswede wrote says Walton was fired. In an interview with Outside the Lines, Allswede says little action was taken in regard to the players, and the report stayed within the athletic department, not to be investigated by anyone who handled student conduct or judicial affairs issues.
It is also worth noting that Izzo didn’t acknowledge Walton’s living arrangements in his response to questions about Walton.
Hollis was still a year away from being promoted to athletic director when his boss assigned him the task of finding Michigan State’s next football coach during the fall of 2006.
Despite the fact that Hollis was not yet the athletic director, he was the one who hired Mark Dantonio.
From bowl destinations to NCAA Tournament sites to the occasional getaways to Mackinac Island they plan together, the three families spend a lot of time outside of East Lansing with one another. Their kids didn’t have much choice in becoming friends.
The oldest, Kristen Dantonio and T.R. Hollis, graduated from Michigan State a year ago. Katy Hollis and Raquel Izzo, both juniors, are roommates. They share a place a couple miles from where their dads lived together 30 years earlier. Lauren Dantonio, also a junior, is a frequent guest.
The relationships between Dantonio, Izzo, and Hollis extend significantly beyond their professional relationship. Their families are all very close. This should be considered for context as this story moves forward. Specifically, it demonstrates just how close Hollis is to both coaches. It is fair to assume that anything Hollis knows that is pertinent to either coaches is information that has been shared between them, and vice-versa. This is in contrast to Hollis’ description of his relationship with Nassar, whom he barely knew. The hypothesis drawn here is that Hollis resigned because of what he knew about Izzo/Dantonio, not because of what he knew about Nassar.
Despite a relatively unremarkable season, Michigan football and in particular, Jim Harbaugh, tends to get a larger share of national coverage than any other program. This year the coverage has had a largely negative slant, despite a modest 8-3 record to date. This is a team that is hitting their pre-season expectation almost exactly (this site projected 8.874 wins, Bill Connelly’s S&P+ projected 8.9 wins, and the Bovada over/under was set at 9 wins), yet if you tuned into ESPN this week you’d think the program is in shambles. So, what’s really going on with Michigan football? Let’s take a look at the national sports media talking points, but with the intent of finding the truth rather than baiting for more readers/viewers with sensational proclamations.
Expectations have not been met
This is both the most common and the most puzzling take I have found, especially as it pertains to this year. Michigan is going to end up, at worst, one game below expectations this season. So technically, yes, they very well could fall just short of their preseason expectations. However, they are far from the only team who will pay out on the ‘under’ this year. Among the Power 5 teams (65 in all, including Notre Dame), 4 are exactly on their over/under total with only one (Northwestern) expected to move above it, 9 are 0.5 below with only 5 projected to move ahead, another 6 (including Michigan) are one game below, and 22 are too far below to get above their mark this year. This puts Michigan at or just below the median for Power 5 teams. Hardly a headline-worthy disappointment.
Team
Conference
Wins
Losses
Over/Under
Difference
Mississippi State
SEC
8
3
5.5
2.5
South Carolina
SEC
8
3
5.5
2.5
Purdue
B1G
5
6
2.5
2.5
Boston College
ACC
6
5
4
2
Wisconsin
B1G
11
0
9.5
1.5
Georgia
SEC
10
1
8.5
1.5
TCU
XII
9
2
7.5
1.5
Notre Dame
Ind
9
2
7.5
1.5
Washington State
P12
9
2
7.5
1.5
Michigan State
B1G
8
3
6.5
1.5
Wake Forest
ACC
7
4
5.5
1.5
Iowa State
XII
7
4
5.5
1.5
Arizona
P12
7
4
5.5
1.5
California
P12
5
6
3.5
1.5
Miami FL
ACC
10
0
9
1
Arizona State
P12
6
5
5
1
Virginia
ACC
6
5
5
1
Rutgers
B1G
4
7
3
1
Alabama
SEC
11
0
10.5
0.5
Oklahoma
XII
10
1
9.5
0.5
Clemson
ACC
10
1
9.5
0.5
USC
P12
10
2
9.5
0.5
Auburn
SEC
9
2
8.5
0.5
Maryland
B1G
4
7
3.5
0.5
Northwestern
B1G
8
3
8
0
Kentucky
SEC
7
4
7
0
Texas A&M
SEC
7
4
7
0
West Virginia
XII
7
4
7
0
Penn State
B1G
9
2
9.5
-0.5
Stanford
P12
8
3
8.5
-0.5
North Carolina State
ACC
7
4
7.5
-0.5
Missouri
SEC
6
5
6.5
-0.5
Iowa
B1G
6
5
6.5
-0.5
Duke
ACC
5
6
5.5
-0.5
Ole Miss
SEC
5
6
5.5
-0.5
Texas Tech
XII
5
6
5.5
-0.5
Syracuse
ACC
4
7
4.5
-0.5
Washington
P12
9
2
10
-1
Oklahoma State
XII
8
3
9
-1
LSU
SEC
8
3
9
-1
Virginia Tech
ACC
8
3
9
-1
Michigan
B1G
8
3
9
-1
Indiana
B1G
5
6
6
-1
Ohio State
B1G
9
2
10.5
-1.5
Texas
XII
6
5
7.5
-1.5
UCLA
P12
5
6
6.5
-1.5
Utah
P12
5
6
6.5
-1.5
Georgia Tech
ACC
5
5
6.5
-1.5
Illinois
B1G
2
9
3.5
-1.5
Oregon
P12
6
5
8
-2
Kansas State
XII
6
5
8
-2
Vanderbilt
SEC
4
7
6
-2
Kansas
XII
1
10
3
-2
Louisville
ACC
7
4
9.5
-2.5
Colorado
P12
5
6
7.5
-2.5
Minnesota
B1G
5
6
7.5
-2.5
Nebraska
B1G
4
7
7
-3
Arkansas
SEC
4
7
7
-3
Pitt
ACC
4
7
7
-3
Tennessee
SEC
4
7
7.5
-3.5
Florida
SEC
4
6
8
-4
North Carolina
ACC
3
8
7
-4
Oregon State
P12
1
10
5.5
-4.5
Florida State
ACC
4
6
9.5
-5.5
Baylor
XII
1
10
7.5
-6.5
Expanding the scope further to Harbaugh’s entire Michigan coaching career:
Cumulatively, this puts Harbaugh’s regular seasons at worst a half game above expectations. In addition Michigan is 1-1 in the postseason under Harbaugh where the win was a blowout and the loss was by one point.
Jim Harbaugh is going to leave for X team after this season
Every year since Harbaugh arrived in Ann Arbor (and even in the days before he was hired at Michigan) there have been rumors that he will be coaching at somewhere besides Michigan the following season. His name was connected with the Raiders, Bears, Jets, and Dolphins in 2014 before choosing Michigan, the Colts in 2015, the Rams in 2016, the Colts again in 2017, and even UCLA was mentioned this week. He hasn’t left yet, and now there are rumors of a lifetime contract with Michigan which could be an attempt to finally dampen these annual rumors that he is leaving.
Harbaugh’s salary is too high
Harbaugh’s salary is often reported as being $9 million, which is not true. It is $7 million. I’m not sure why this matters enough to talk about, but for whatever reason it is a common talking point when Harbaugh’s name comes up. The $9 million comes from a 2016 life insurance policy which included two $2 million premium payments for the insurance in addition to the $5 million salary.
Coach salaries are misconstrued to be proportional to the number of wins a coach earns with the team, but that’s not really how they work. Their salary represents their market value, i.e. how much an entity is willing to pay them for their services. This is no different than any other profession. If a company wants to keep an employee that they deem valuable who is being pursued by a competitor, the current employer may offer a higher salary to ward off the competition and get their employee to stay. This does not mean that the employee will instantly perform better at their job. The higher salary is a reflection of the demand for their services; their perceived value.
Harbaugh’s antics are all for show
Everything Harbaugh does is with a purpose. That purpose is most commonly recruiting exposure and improving the student-athlete experience for his players. Things like trips to Florida and Rome with the entire team for spring practices are a way to reward his players which were (at the time) within the NCAA rules. These experiences are being provided instead of under the table payments to players, which is a less out-in-the-open but much more accommodated reward system.
Stories of unusual recruiting tactics surface from time-to-time, whether it be climbing trees with a recruit or spending the night at their house, and these are met with enthusiasm by the recruits but with derision by opposing fans and media. But if it works and is within the rules, why should it stop?
There was even ridicule of his actions on the sidelines, as if he is the only coach to ever express emotion during a game. He has since dialed it back in 2017 after the introduction of a rule created to detract his outbursts. He was penalized once in 2016 before this rule existed, but has not been penalized since.
“His best finish is 3rd in the division”
This one is technically true, but really needs some context as its aim is only to sound degrading. In 2015, Michigan finished ranked 12th in the final AP poll. Two teams in their division finished ranked 4th and 6th, respectively. In 2016, Michigan finished ranked 10th in the final AP poll. And again, two teams in the division finished ranked higher, this time 6th and 7th. The claim of finishing 3rd does not paint an accurate picture of the success, as 3rd out of 7 sounds much worse than 12th or 10th out of 128. This claim is intentionally misleading, and really only speaks to the strength of their division as no other division had 3 teams ranked as highly as the Big Ten East had in either 2015 or 2016.
Michigan’s roster is full of 4 and 5-star players
Michigan typically has highly ranked recruiting classes. The classes which could make up the 2017 roster (2013 through 2017) were ranked as follows:
Recruiting Class
Class Rank
# of commits
2017
5th
30
2016
8th
28
2015
37th
14
2014
20th
16
2013
4th
27
This breakdown implies that the youth on the team and any players who stuck around for a 5th year would make up the most talented portion of the roster. However, attrition played a huge role in shaping this roster, nearly all of which occurred in recruiting classes assembled prior to Harbaugh’s arrival. Here’s a list of all the players from one of the five classes above who left the program early for reasons other than entering the NFL Draft, and their last year of competition with Michigan:
Recruiting Class
Player
Star Rating
Position
Final year with program
2015
Brian Cole
4
ATH
2015
2015
Keith Washington
3
ATH
2016
2013
Ross Douglas
3
CB
2015
2013
Reon Dawson
3
CB
2015
2014
Michael Ferns
4
LB
2014
2013
Logan Tulley-Tillman
4
OL
2015
2013
Kyle Bosch
4
OL
2014
2013
Dan Samuelson
3
OL
2014
2015
Grant Newsome
4
OL
2016*
2013
Chris Fox
4
OL
2014
2013
David Dawson
4
OL
2016
2013
Shane Morris
4
QB
2016
2013
Derrick Green
5
RB
2015
2016
Devin Asiasi
4
TE
2016
2014
Freddy Canteen
4
WR
2015
2013
Csont’e York
3
WR
2013
2013
Da’Mario Jones
3
WR
2015
2016
Nate Johnson
3
WR
2016
2013
Jaron Dukes
3
WR
2015
*Newsome injured his leg early in the 2016 season and has not yet returned.
Note that there are 6 offensive linemen who left the program earlier than expected; 5 of which would be 5th year seniors and Newsome who would be the starting left tackle. Offensive line also happens to be the most heavily criticized position on Michigan’s roster, and this illustrates why there is a problem. Some attrition is to be expected in football, but losing 6 would-be veteran players from the same position group would crater any roster.
Also note that 10 players from the 2013 class left the program after 3 or fewer years. Again, some attrition is to be expected, but losing over a third of a class well before their eligibility runs out will eventually take a toll.
Harbaugh has never won a championship
This take is bizarre in two ways. First, it is very selective in what is deemed a championship, as Harbaugh led the University of San Diego to two conference championships (2005 & 2006) in his 3 years as their head coach, Stanford to an Orange Bowl championship in 2010, and the 49ers to an NFC championship in 2012. This implies that conference championships don’t count at the FCS level or in the NFL, but at the FBS level not only do they count but count for more than a postseason major bowl victory and final AP ranking of 4th. Secondly, it implies that a championship is the only criteria for a successful coach. He has been at Michigan for just under 3 seasons, and here is the list of teams with equal or higher winning percentages in that same time frame:
Rank
Team
Record
Win Pct.
1
Alabama
39-2
0.9512
2
Clemson
38-3
0.9268
t3
Ohio State
32-5
0.8649
t3
Oklahoma
32-5
0.8649
5
Wisconsin
32-6
0.8421
6
Stanford
30-8
0.7895
t7
Michigan
28-9
0.7568
t7
Georgia
28-9
0.7568
t7
Oklahoma State
28-9
0.7568
He wears out his welcome
Harbaugh’s coaching trajectory has been as follows:
Team
Title
Years
Oakland Raiders
QB coach
2002-2003
San Diego Toreros (FCS)
Head coach
2004-2006
Stanford Cardinal
Head coach
2007-2010
San Francisco 49ers
Head coach
2011-2014
Michigan Wolverines
Head coach
2015-present
Each move prior to landing at Michigan has been an obvious step-up, which tends to happen for coaches who perform well. The move from the 49ers to Michigan can be interpreted as a step down, but it cannot be interpreted as a demotion since he chose Michigan over numerous other NFL positions as shown in linked article earlier and it was not a firing but a mutual decision.
The national media has bungled their coverage on Harbaugh at Michigan since before he arrived in December 2014. They have gotten in wrong every year since. Why should anyone trust them to get it right today or going forward?
If you want the real story of what’s going on with Michigan football, the national media is not the place to go. Their job is to cover everything a little bit, it is inch-deep/mile-wide coverage. If you want in-depth coverage, you need to go to a local source, media that only covers this team. Or better yet, go straight to the source: Jim Harbaugh has a weekly podcast with his dad co-hosting. Amazon is chronicling the 2017 Michigan football season with a series set to air in January on Amazon Prime.
So, what’s left? Michigan is performing as closely to expectations as possible, Harbaugh is not leaving for the NFL, and Michigan’s program is actually in decent shape for the future with a young, talented roster. Pretty boring, right? But if this were the story that was being told, nobody would pay attention; nobody would care because it isn’t interesting.
If Michigan loses tomorrow, all of these points will be harped on again as if there is a serious problem to address. And if Michigan wins, they will be celebrated excessively and most of this will be forgotten. At least until their next loss.
I’ve promised that I would never place a 100% win probability on any game on this site, and that will always be true here. My goal is to determine the likelihood of outcomes and identify the safest picks. But what makes a pick safe? When it comes to sports, especially at a non-professional level as is the primary focus here, there really doesn’t appear to be a truly safe pick. But when a specific match-up features the same result, year after year, it becomes difficult to believe that a different outcome will occur in the next event.
This week, Michigan State plays at Michigan. This will be the 11th meeting in which Mark Dantonio is the Spartans head coach. In the previous 10 meetings between these two teams, against the spread, he is 10-0. His team covers when they’re favored and when they’re underdogs. Home or away; doesn’t matter. Here’s what I’m talking about:
I include the 2nd graphic to show that the line opened at Michigan -4.5, which MSU did cover. The first graphic shows that the line closed at Michigan -3.5, which MSU did not cover. At that point we’re really splitting hairs though; this streak is truly incredible.
The opening line for this game on October 7th is -12.5 in favor of Michigan. I’m not saying this is a guaranteed cover for MSU, but I mean…10 in a row? Something is going on here that the Vegas oddsmakers have failed to recognize for a decade. Will this year be any different? I wouldn’t bet on it.
The first 3 parts of this preview series looked at coaches, rosters, and schedules. Now, we’ll put it all together and project how well each FBS team will perform this season.
The table below will be updated throughout the season to track up-to-date projections as well as compare against how accurate the pre-season projections turn out to be. In addition to team and conference affiliation, the table displays the following:
Preseason expected wins (this will remain unchanged throughout the season)
It would take a mild upset somewhere along the way for each of Ohio State, Alabama, Washington, and South Florida to not go 12-0 in the regular season.
My numbers are very optimistic on UAB, Nevada, Hawaii, and UTEP; each with more than 2.5 expected wins above the Bovada over/under.
Conversely, my numbers are not high on Minnesota, Army, San Diego State, Louisiana Tech, and Miami OH; each with more than 2.5 expected wins below the Bovada over/under.
It is a bit surprising to see Boise State projected at only 6.17 and Stanford at 6.77 wins. Stanford has a pretty brutal schedule, but Boise’s is manageable. They’re one to keep an eye on.
UCLA at only 5.48 wins doesn’t bode well for Jim Mora coaching the Bruins in 2018. Notre Dame at 7.06 may not be enough for Brian Kelly, either.
Postseason Outlook
It really doesn’t make much sense to forecast postseason results before the season has begun because so many factors have yet to be realized (injuries, breakout players), but for ease of interpreting my full FBS projections here are the projected postseason championships based on the information available today.
Conference championship projections (projected winners in bold)
ACC Clemson vs Miami FL
Big Ten Ohio State vs Wisconsin
Big XII Oklahoma vs Texas
Pac12 Washington vs USC
SEC Alabama vs Georgia
American South Florida vs Memphis
CUSA Western Kentucky vs UTSA
MAC Ohio vs Central Michigan
Mountain West Hawaii vs Colorado State
Sun Belt Appalachian State (Sun Belt championship game beginning in 2018)
Playoff Projection (does this look familiar?)
Ohio State vs. Clemson
Alabama vs. Washington
Championship game: Ohio State vs Alabama
National Champion: Alabama
Despite a projected 13-0 season, South Florida’s schedule is far too weak to be considered for a playoff berth. It is thoroughly disappointing that my numbers project the same 4 teams as appeared in the 2016 College Football Playoff, but each of these 4 returns a very strong roster (the top 3 nationally plus Clemson at 8th nationally), their schedules are manageable (Alabama’s is the toughest at 16th but their toughest game is in week 1, while the other 3 schedules rank in the 50s), and they’ve all been on the biggest stage recently so they know what it takes to get there. At any rate, I’m confident some sort of chaos will derail at least one of these teams’ chances, but I don’t have a way to quantify that chaos yet.
This marks the end of my 2017 season preview series. Now we have actual college football games to watch this week! Win probabilities for Week 0 games will be posted prior to Saturday.
Scheduling matters. A team may have its strongest roster in years, but if it faces a brutal schedule it may not produce a record to reflect the strength of its roster. Conversely, a team may be over-valued due to a cakewalk of a schedule.
Biggest games of the year
The 2017 season features 3 games in which it is the hardest game of the year for both teams:
Alabama vs Florida State
Ohio State at Michigan
South Florida at Central Florida
These first two should not be too surprising, but when you look at South Florida’s schedule and realize their most difficult game is at Central Florida it’s no wonder they are a heavy favorite to be the G5 representative in a NY6 bowl.
The table below ranks the overall strength of schedule (regular season only) for all FBS teams. The SoS value represents the total number of standard deviations above or below a team’s complete schedule is relative to an “average” FBS schedule (i.e. cumulatively game-by-game, so if all games were 1 SD above the mean, the SoS value=12) . Additionally, the easiest game and 4 most difficult games with venues are listed next to each team to help illustrate why their schedule ranks in its position.
*Note: Most teams have not posted their Fall rosters yet, so this preview is looking at Spring 2017 rosters. Values will change slightly as Fall rosters become available; freshmen who didn’t enroll early, off-season attrition, and injuries/suspensions have not yet been factored into my roster values.
I evaluate rosters by looking at a few components: returning all-conference/all-American team members, recruiting rankings, and class standing for every player on every roster. After assigning each player a score, I add up the scores for the top-70 rated players on each roster to determine the overall roster value. I’ve settled on 70 instead of the 85 full-scholarship number because players beyond the 70th man on the roster are rarely seeing any game action. I also adjust for injuries/suspensions such that if a player in the top 70 will be out for a game, his player score will temporarily be set to zero and everyone beneath him moves up a slot, so the 71st player on the roster would then move into the top 70 and their score would count towards the roster value. Roster values are used in combination with coach win/expectation rate and game venue to compare teams and determine the likelihood of winning a given game.
Once again, Alabama and Ohio State are in a class by themselves when it comes to talent on the roster. Newcomers to FBS for 2017, UAB and Coastal Carolina, may be facing a bit of an acclimation period until they can assemble a more complete roster, though UAB compares rather favorably to their Conference USA brethren.
It’s a bit jarring to see Illinois and Syracuse so low on this list. South Florida should be a serious contender for a NY6 bowl in year 1 under Charlie Strong.
School
Top 70
Conference
Alabama
106.25
SEC
Ohio State
106.25
B1G
Washington
92
P12
Florida State
89.5
ACC
Clemson
86.25
ACC
LSU
83.25
SEC
Oklahoma
80.25
XII
Georgia
79.5
SEC
Texas
77.25
XII
Auburn
76.25
SEC
Penn State
74.5
B1G
USC
72.5
P12
Oregon
71
P12
TCU
71
XII
UCLA
69.25
P12
Michigan
67.75
B1G
Florida
66
SEC
Notre Dame
65.75
Ind
South Florida
64.25
Amer
Ole Miss
64
SEC
Oklahoma State
63.25
XII
Texas A&M
62.25
SEC
Arizona State
58.25
P12
Tennessee
57.25
SEC
Kansas State
54.75
XII
Miami FL
54.5
ACC
Nebraska
54.25
B1G
Washington State
53
P12
Arkansas State
52.5
SunBelt
Michigan State
52.5
B1G
Utah
52.5
P12
Western Kentucky
52.25
CUSA
Louisville
52.25
ACC
Toledo
52
MAC
Arkansas
51.25
SEC
Troy
50
SunBelt
Central Michigan
49.25
MAC
BYU
48
Ind
Stanford
48
P12
Colorado
47.75
P12
North Carolina State
47.25
ACC
New Mexico State
46.75
SunBelt
Northern Illinois
46.5
MAC
Kentucky
46.25
SEC
Colorado State
46.25
MtnW
Iowa State
46
XII
Appalachian State
46
SunBelt
Baylor
45.25
XII
Memphis
45
Amer
Pitt
45
ACC
Central Florida
44.75
Amer
Maryland
44.75
B1G
Northwestern
44.25
B1G
Western Michigan
44
MAC
Ohio
43.75
MAC
San Diego State
43.75
MtnW
Nevada
43.25
MtnW
Boise State
43.25
MtnW
Mississippi State
43
SEC
Akron
42.75
MAC
Houston
42.75
Amer
California
42.75
P12
North Carolina
42.75
ACC
South Carolina
42
SEC
Tulsa
41.5
Amer
Temple
40.5
Amer
Missouri
40.25
SEC
Arizona
40
P12
Hawaii
39.75
MtnW
Virginia
39.75
ACC
Virginia Tech
39.5
ACC
Iowa
39.5
B1G
Wisconsin
39.5
B1G
Middle Tennessee
39.25
CUSA
Indiana
38.75
B1G
Southern Miss
38
CUSA
Georgia State
37.25
SunBelt
Vanderbilt
37.25
SEC
San Jose State
37.25
MtnW
Bowling Green
36.75
MAC
Oregon State
36.5
P12
UAB
36.5
CUSA
UTSA
36.25
CUSA
North Texas
36
CUSA
Eastern Michigan
35.25
MAC
West Virginia
35
XII
Louisiana-Lafayette
34.75
SunBelt
Florida Atlantic
34.5
CUSA
UTEP
34.5
CUSA
New Mexico
34.25
MtnW
Rice
34.25
CUSA
Minnesota
33.75
B1G
Old Dominion
33.5
CUSA
Georgia Tech
33
ACC
Purdue
32.75
B1G
Rutgers
32.25
B1G
Kent State
32
MAC
Cincinnati
32
Amer
Duke
31.75
ACC
East Carolina
31.5
Amer
Buffalo
31.5
MAC
Boston College
31
ACC
Idaho
30.5
SunBelt
Navy
30.5
Amer
Wyoming
30.5
MtnW
Texas Tech
30.5
XII
SMU
30.25
Amer
Connecticut
29.75
Amer
Wake Forest
29.75
ACC
Florida International
28.75
CUSA
Louisiana Tech
28.75
CUSA
Marshall
28.5
CUSA
Coastal Carolina
28.5
SunBelt
UNLV
27.5
MtnW
Fresno State
27.25
MtnW
Utah State
27
MtnW
Miami OH
26.5
MAC
Massachusetts
26.25
MAC
Tulane
26.25
Amer
Kansas
26
XII
Charlotte
26
CUSA
Georgia Southern
25.25
SunBelt
Ball State
24.75
MAC
Air Force
24.75
MtnW
Syracuse
24.25
ACC
Illinois
23
B1G
South Alabama
22.5
SunBelt
Louisiana-Monroe
22
SunBelt
Army
21.5
Ind
Texas State
18
SunBelt
Short preview this week, but the next two weeks previewing schedules and season projections, respectively, will feature much more content.
Fall camp is underway across the country, which means the season is finally around the corner! This year I have split the season preview into four parts: Coaches, Rosters, Schedules, and Projections. First up we’ll take a look at coaching, how it impacts a team’s success, how much turnover can be expected year-to-year, and how intertwined coaching ties have become at the Power 5 level.
Win/expectation rate
This value represents the rate which a coach wins games compared to their expectation, in terms of win probability. The input data is the most recent 4 seasons which a coach has led his current team, weighted towards the most recent seasons. If a coach has been with his team for fewer than 4 seasons, then his full tenure with the current team is used.
As an example, Paul Chryst* has the highest win/expectation rate among active coaches, at .3212. This means that Chryst increases Wisconsin’s win probability relative to their roster strength by approximately .32 standard deviations. By default, all coaches in their first year with a team start the season at zero and the rate adjusts after each game.
Coaches on the bottom end of the spectrum are likely to be fired without marked improvement. For reference, the lowest win/expectation rate in 2016 was Charlie Strong at Texas, with a rate of -.3126.
The inherent bias in this scale favors coaches who don’t recruit as strongly but win a lot of games, and penalizes coaches who recruit very strong rosters. This is why you don’t see names like Nick Saban or Urban Meyer near the top of this list (their recruiting prowess will be recognized in the Rosters preview).
*This high win expectation rate at Wisconsin tends to exist regardless of who is their current head coach, suggesting that recruiting ranking services are undervaluing Wisconsin prospects.
Highest win/expectation rates heading into 2017:
School
Coach
Win/Expectation Rate
Wisconsin
Paul Chryst
0.3212
Air Force
Troy Calhoun
0.3189
Navy
Ken Niumatalolo
0.3128
Tulsa
Philip Montgomery
0.2796
Appalachian State
Scott Satterfield
0.2496
Troy
Neal Brown
0.2251
West Virginia
Dana Holgorsen
0.2242
Utah
Kyle Whittingham
0.2187
Washington State
Mike Leach
0.2159
BYU
Kalani Sitake
0.2120
Virginia Tech
Justin Fuente
0.2051
Lowest win/expectation rates:
School
Coach
Win/Expectation Rate
East Carolina
Scottie Montgomery
-0.1735
Missouri
Barry Odom
-0.1748
Massachusetts
Mark Whipple
-0.1870
Kansas
David Beaty
-0.1933
Texas State
Everett Withers
-0.2029
Georgia
Kirby Smart
-0.2090
Rutgers
Chris Ash
-0.2252
Notre Dame
Brian Kelly
-0.2438
Charlotte
Brad Lambert
-0.2516
UCLA
Jim L. Mora
-0.3007
Virginia
Bronco Mendenhall
-0.3094
It’s not realistic to say a coach is actually on the hot seat in year 2 so most of these guys don’t belong in that conversation just yet, though if they under-perform expectations again their names may come up in that discussion next year. Brian Kelly and Jim Mora, on the other hand, desperately need to have a successful 2017. It’s interesting to see BYU with one of the highest rates and their former coach Bronco Mendenhall with the lowest rate. Another year will shed light on whether he is a good fit at Virginia.
New coaches
FBS coaching turnover rate is typically around 22 coaches per year, and 2017 falls right in line with 23 coaches starting their first season with their team. The lowest number of new coaches to start a season since 1987 was 11 in 1988 followed by 12 in 2006. The highest number of new coaches was 33 to start the 2013 season.
Team
New Coach
Coach’s Previous Stop
Baylor
Matt Rhule
Temple, Head Coach
California
Justin Wilcox
Wisconsin, DC
Cincinnati
Luke Fickell
Ohio State, co-DC
Connecticut
Randy Edsall
Detroit Lions, staff
Florida Atlantic
Lane Kiffin
Alabama, OC
Florida International
Butch Davis
North Carolina, HC (2010)
Fresno State
Jeff Tedford
Washington, staff
Georgia State
Shawn Elliott
South Carolina, OL
Houston
Major Applewhite
Houston, OC
Indiana
Tom Allen
Indiana, DC
LSU
Ed Orgeron
LSU, DL & interim Head Coach
Minnesota
P. J. Fleck
Western Michigan, Head Coach
Nevada
Jay Norvell
Arizona State, PGC
Oklahoma
Lincoln Riley
Oklahoma, OC
Ole Miss
Matt Luke
Ole Miss, OC
Oregon
Willie Taggart
South Florida, Head Coach
Purdue
Jeff Brohm
Western Kentucky, Head Coach
San Jose State
Brent Brennan
Oregon State, WR
South Florida
Charlie Strong
Texas, Head Coach
Temple
Geoff Collins
Florida, DC
Texas
Tom Herman
Houston, Head Coach
Western Kentucky
Mike Sanford Jr
Notre Dame, OC
Western Michigan
Tim Lester
Purdue, QB
Iowa is the only FBS program to have the same coach since 2000. Houston and Georgia Southern have experienced the most coaching turnover in that time, each with 7 different head coaches during the Kirk Ferentz era at Iowa.
Next Man Up (Power 5 only)
In order to prepare for inevitable turnover, athletic directors across the country need to have a list of names ready to go should a replacement be needed on short notice. Here are some names that are likely to be in the conversation for Power 5 openings in 2018, as well as candidates with ties* to each Power 5 school:
Available Big-Name coaches:
Art Briles– Fired amidst scandal at Baylor. At age 61 and carrying recent baggage, it is unlikely that Briles will land a head coaching gig again, but a desperate program may take a flyer on him at OC.
Jeff Fisher– Most recently coached the Los Angeles Rams in 2016, Fisher has never coached outside of the NFL. At age 59, he may be content to stay out of coaching, but it wouldn’t be surprising to see his name floated around for high-profile college openings.
Hugh Freeze– Very recently let go at Ole Miss, Freeze may be a little toxic for a year or so. However, if Bobby Petrino can bounce back from his incident, Freeze should be able to as well. Freeze is only 47 years old; he’ll be back in coaching one day.
Jim Grobe– Last seen as Baylor’s interim coach in 2016, but at age 65 is probably not a viable head coaching hire anymore.
Mark Helfrich– Fired from Oregon after a disappointing 2016 season, but just 3 years removed from a national championship game appearance. Only 43 years old, Helfrich will definitely get another shot very soon.
Chip Kelly– Possibly the biggest name out there at the moment. Kelly will be mentioned for every high profile college and NFL opening until he accepts an offer. At 53 years old, he’s got plenty of years left in the tank.
Les Miles– Fired mid-season 2016 at LSU, but Miles is still very much a viable head-coaching candidate and has expressed interest in wanting to get back in the game ASAP. He’ll turn 64 this fall, but Miles would be a great get for a program looking to make a quick splash in recruiting.
Bo Pelini– Currently the head coach for FCS Youngstown State, but Pelini is way too good of a coach to stay at that level for long. He’s only 49 years old, and last year took the Penguins to the FCS championship game. He won 9 or 10 games in each of his 7 seasons as Nebraska’s head coach.
Bob Stoops– Recently retired from Oklahoma and has publicly stated he wants to enjoy his retirement, but programs will definitely attempt to lure Stoops back into the game. He’ll turn 57 this season.
Jim Tressel– Currently the president at Youngstown State. It seems like if Tressel was going to get back into coaching it would’ve happened for the 2017 season, as his show-cause penalty expired in December 2016. He’s 64 years old, so it’s difficult to imagine a high-profile program chasing him, but this would be a very splashy hire for anyone looking to get a little publicity.
Tommy Tuberville– Most recently fired from Cincinnati, Tuberville may not grab another head coaching gig at age 62, but would be an appealing addition to a staff for recruiting purposes.
Team
Current Coach
Replacement Candidate & connection
Alabama
Nick Saban
Dabo Swinney, Clemson head coach- former Alabama player & WR coach
Arizona State
Todd Graham
Jay Norvell, Nevada head coach- former Arizona State PGC
Arizona
Rich Rodriguez
Dino Babers, Syracuse head coach- former Arizona OC
Arkansas
Bret Bielema
Gus Malzahn, Auburn head coach- former Arkansas OC
Auburn
Gus Malzahn
Jimbo Fisher, Florida State head coach- former Auburn QB coach
Baylor
Matt Rhule
Philip Montgomery, Tulsa head coach- former Baylor OC
Boston College
Steve Addazio
Doug Martin, New Mexico State head coach- former Boston College OC
California
Justin Wilcox
Hue Jackson, Cleveland Browns head coach- former California OC
Clemson
Dabo Swinney
Chad Morris, SMU head coach- former Clemson OC
Colorado
Mike MacIntyre
Pat Fitzgerald, Northwestern head coach- former Colorado GA
Duke
David Cutcliffe
Scottie Montgomery, East Carolina head coach- former Duke OC
Florida
Jim McElwain
Geoff Collins, Temple head coach- former Florida DC
Florida State
Jimbo Fisher
Kirby Smart, Georgia head coach- former Florida State GA
Georgia
Kirby Smart
Mike Bobo, Colorado State head coach- former Georgia OC
Georgia Tech
Paul Johnson
Jeff Monken, Army head coach- former Georgia Tech RB coach
Illinois
Lovie Smith
Paul Petrino, Idaho head coach- former Illinois OC
Indiana
Tom Allen
Rod Carey, Northern Illinois head coach- former Indiana player
Iowa
Kirk Ferentz
Bret Bielema, Arkansas head coach- former Iowa player & LB coach
Iowa State
Matt Campbell
Chris Ash, Rutgers head coach- former Iowa State DB coach
Kansas
David Beaty
Dave Doeren, North Carolina State head coach- former Kansas co-DC
Kansas State
Bill Snyder
Brad Lambert, Charlotte head coach- former Kansas State player
Kentucky
Mark Stoops
Neal Brown, Troy head coach- former Kentucky OC
Louisville
Bobby Petrino
Jeff Brohm, Purdue head coach- former Louisville player & OC
LSU
Ed Orgeron
Frank Wilson, UTSA head coach- former LSU RB coach
Maryland
D.J. Durkin
Mike Gundy, Oklahoma State head coach- former Maryland PGC
Miami FL
Mark Richt
Mark Whipple, Massachusetts head coach- former Miami FL OC
Michigan State
Mark Dantonio
Pat Narduzzi, Pitt head coach- former Michigan State DC
Michigan
Jim Harbaugh
D.J. Durkin, Maryland head coach- former Michigan DC
Minnesota
P. J. Fleck
Everett Withers, Texas State head coach- former Minnesota DC
Mississippi State
Dan Mullen
Mark Hudspeth, Louisiana-Lafayette head coach- former Mississippi State PGC
Missouri
Barry Odom
Dirk Koetter, Tampa Bay Buccaneers head coach- former Missouri OC
Nebraska
Mike Riley
Scott Frost, Central Florida head coach- former Nebraska player & GA
North Carolina
Larry Fedora
Blake Anderson, Arkansas State head coach- former North Carolina OC
North Carolina State
Dave Doeren
Doc Holliday, Marshall head coach- former North Carolina State WR coach
Northwestern^
Pat Fitzgerald
Kevin Wilson, Ohio State OC- former Northwestern OC
Notre Dame
Brian Kelly
Skip Holtz, Louisiana Tech head coach, former Notre Dame OC
Ohio State
Urban Meyer
Tom Herman, Texas head coach- former Ohio State OC
Oklahoma
Lincoln Riley
Seth Littrell, North Texas head coach- former Oklahoma player
Oklahoma State
Mike Gundy
Larry Fedora, North Carolina head coach- former Oklahoma State OC
Ole Miss
Matt Luke
Tom Allen, Indiana head coach- former Ole Miss LB coach
Oregon
Willie Taggart
Chris Petersen, Washington head coach- former Oregon WR coach
Oregon State
Gary Andersen
Kalani Sitake, BYU head coach- former Oregon State DC
Penn State
James Franklin
Matt Rhule, Baylor head coach- former Penn State player
Pitt
Pat Narduzzi
Mike Norvell, Memphis head coach- former Pitt co-OC
Purdue
Jeff Brohm
Kevin Sumlin, Texas A&M head coach- former Purdue player & WR coach
Rutgers
Chris Ash
P.J. Fleck, Minnesota head coach- former Rutgers WR coach
South Carolina
Will Muschamp
Shawn Elliott, Georgia State head coach- former South Carolina co-OC
Stanford
David Shaw
Willie Taggart, Oregon head coach- former Stanford RB coach
Syracuse
Dino Babers
Tim Lester, Western Michigan head coach- former Syracuse OC
TCU
Gary Patterson
Justin Fuente, Virginia Tech head coach- former TCU co-OC
Tennessee
Butch Jones
Dave Clawson, Wake Forest head coach- former Tennessee OC
Texas A&M
Kevin Sumlin
David Beaty, Kansas head coach- former Texas A&M WR coach
Texas
Tom Herman
Major Applewhite, Houston head coach- former Texas player & co-OC
Texas Tech
Kliff Kingsbury
Mike Jinks, Bowling Green head coach- former Texas Tech RB coach
UCLA
Jim L. Mora
Brent Brennan, San Jose State head coach, former UCLA player
USC
Clay Helton
Mike Riley, Nebraska head coach- former USC OC
Utah
Kyle Whittingham
Gary Andersen, Oregon State head coach- former Utah DC
Vanderbilt
Derek Mason
Mike MacIntyre, Colorado head coach- former Vanderbilt player#
Virginia
Bronco Mendenhall
No obvious candidate with ties to school
Virginia Tech
Justin Fuente
Bud Foster, current Virginia Tech DC
Wake Forest
Dave Clawson
Troy Calhoun, Air Force head coach- former Wake Forest OC
Washington
Chris Petersen
Jim L. Mora, UCLA head coach- former Washington player & GA
Washington State
Mike Leach
James Franklin, Penn State head coach- former Washington State TE coach
West Virginia
Dana Holgorsen
Todd Graham, Arizona State head coach- former West Virginia co-DC
Wisconsin
Paul Chryst
Justin Wilcox, California head coach- former Wisconsin DC
*Incredibly, every Power 5 program except Virginia and Virginia Tech has ties to a current head coach in either the NFL or at another FBS program. Note that the viability of candidates with ties to a school may not be great, this is just an illustration of how intertwined the coaching community is today.
^The only active head coach with Northwestern ties is Jim Caldwell with the Detroit Lions. At age 62, Caldwell seemed less likely than Wilson (age 55) as a candidate which would be mentioned as a viable replacement.
#MacIntyre eventually transferred to and graduated from Georgia Tech, but began his college playing career with Vanderbilt.
It started off so well. 29 of 32 in Round 1 with all of the Sweet 16 still intact. Then Wisconsin knocked out my national champion pick and my entire bracket is worthless. So, what went wrong?
Don’t ignore the immeasurables. I was so immersed in the numbers from this season in the week leading up to the tournament that I completely ignored the factors that are either not quantifiable or difficult to objectively quantify. Villanova was the defending champ, and thus had a high likelihood of complacency in this year’s tournament. Unless a defending champion is returning an absurd amount of talent (like Florida in the 2007 tournament or Duke in the 1992 tournament), they are unlikely to pull off the repeat. In fact, history shows they’re much more likely to have an early exit than to make a deep run. Wisconsin, on the other hand, was wildly under-seeded and likely ticked off about it. They were set out to show the committee that they were wrong, and did so emphatically by handling Virginia Tech with relative ease in Round 1, followed by the biggest upset of the tournament in Round 2 by knocking off the defending champs.
Protect the king! As I mentioned in my Bracket Guidelines last week, the early rounds don’t mean a thing if your champion gets knocked out early. It is vitally important to pick a viable champion; a safe champion. Villanova, despite what my formula proclaimed about their regular season successes, was not a safe pick. Their roster wasn’t nearly strong enough to justify a repeat championship, and their coach’s tournament history outside of last year is very underwhelming. Last year’s run was a historical anomaly for Jay Wright; this year was par for the course.
Aside from the wacky East region, the rest of my bracket turned out just fine, with 12 of my Sweet 16 advancing and 6 of the Elite 8 remaining. That one missing piece though is an absolute crater. I’ll be sure to make mention of the non-quantifiable factors next year prior to the start of the tournament.
I may post a tournament recap in a couple weeks if there is an interesting conclusion but otherwise will be shifting into off-season mode, which means a much lower frequency of posts. I do have a few off-season features in the works that aim to answer some misunderstood statistical claims:
Is it really that difficult to beat a team for a 3rd time in a season?
Just how significant is home-court advantage, and how much of it is attributable to officiating deference to the home team?
I’ll also update standings on my Best Dual Sports schools and shift data tables (such as the Best Dual Sports and college football win probabilities) to a Google Sheets format going forward. Follow me on Twitter for notifications on my latest posts.
